How to reduce childcare fee arrears in your centre
A direct debit fails on a Thursday. Nobody notices until the following Tuesday. The family is spoken to the week after that — apologetically, by an educator at pickup, because she was the one who happened to see them. By the time the balance reaches the owner it is six weeks old, three cycles deep, and the family has stopped replying to emails.
Nothing unusual happened in that sequence. That is exactly the problem.
What a collection system is, and the number it protects
A fee collection system is five things written down — a direct-debit mandate taken at enrolment, a fixed billing cycle, a dated escalation ladder, a named authority for waivers and payment plans, and a write-off rule — and the number it protects is not revenue but collected revenue per place, which is the only version of the figure that reaches your bank account.
Each of the five is a document, not a habit. In that order:
A direct-debit mandate at enrolment. Signed with the enrolment pack, before the first day, not chased in week three. A mandate captured at enrolment is a five-minute administrative task; the same mandate captured after a family has already paid by bank transfer twice is a negotiation.
A fixed billing cycle. One debit day, the same day every cycle, with fees charged in advance. Families budget around a predictable date. Rolling or irregular debits generate dishonours that have nothing to do with a family’s capacity to pay.
A dated escalation ladder. What happens on day one, day seven, day fourteen and day thirty, and who does each step. The dates matter more than the wording, because a ladder without dates collapses into whoever feels least uncomfortable making the call.
A named authority for waivers and payment plans. One person may agree a variation, and every variation is written down. Your centre director should know without asking whether she can approve a fortnight’s grace.
A write-off rule. A test for when a debt stops being an arrear and becomes a bad debt, applied on a schedule rather than at the end of a bad quarter.
The gap between what a centre charges and what it actually banks is already the cleanest read on whether pricing discipline has slipped — that diagnostic sits in our guide to setting childcare fees. Collection is the other half of the same gap, and it is usually the half nobody owns.
The compliance floor is already written for you
Most operators build a collection policy from scratch without realising the Australian Government has effectively drafted the minimum standard.
Since 1 July 2023, families receiving Child Care Subsidy must pay the gap fee — the family-paid portion after subsidy — electronically, and providers must collect it directly (Department of Education). Sitting over that is the Family Assistance Law obligation to take all reasonable steps to collect gap fees; routine waiving is a compliance breach rather than a gesture of goodwill. The mechanics of the obligation, and what a buyer’s adviser does with the resulting ledger, are set out in our article on CCS remittances and fee debtors in due diligence, and the gap fee itself is explained in how the Child Care Subsidy works.
What “reasonable steps” looks like in practice is spelled out in the Department’s own guidance, and it is unglamorous: hold written policies and procedures for managing fee debt; give families regular, clear and timely advice about their gap fees; contact a family about a missed payment before the next payment falls due; and keep records of what you did and when. The Department also gives a figure operators can measure themselves against — the collection interval for gap fees should ideally be no longer than a month.
That last point is the one worth pinning to the wall. If your centre is billing in arrears on a six-week cycle, or letting balances roll to the end of term, you are outside the Department’s own guidance before a single family falls behind.
There are narrow exceptions to electronic payment. A provider can apply for a service-level exception, and can apply on behalf of an individual family — including a family who reasonably fears that paying electronically would put them or their child at risk of family or domestic violence. The provider lodges the application, not the family, and exceptions are reassessed annually.
ChildcareLink Insight: In centres we review before a sale, the collection policy is usually the only operating document that was never written down. Fee schedules, enrolment forms and complaint procedures all exist in a folder; what happens when a debit bounces lives in the director’s head. Writing it down is a two-hour job that pays for itself in one cycle. |
The escalation ladder, and the point where it stops being lawful
A ladder works because it is boring and it is early. Ours, in the order we recommend building it:
Day 0 — the dishonour is a system event, not a conversation. Your childcare management software should flag a failed payment the day it fails and put it in a queue someone reviews daily. If you are relying on a monthly reconciliation to discover dishonours, that is a software and workflow problem before it is a collection problem — see the software systems every centre needs.
Day 1 to 2 — one written contact, before the next debit. Short, factual, with the amount, the reason and the date of the next attempt. This is the contact the Department’s guidance is pointing at, and it resolves the large majority of dishonours, because most are a card expiry or an insufficient balance on a single day.
Day 7 — a named person owns it. A phone call from administration or the director, not from an educator at pickup. Educators hold the care relationship and should never be made the debt channel; it damages the relationship and it produces exactly the six-week drift in the example above.
Day 14 — a written payment arrangement, or a decision. A dated schedule the family signs, with the ordinary debit continuing alongside it. An arrangement that is not written down is not an arrangement.
Day 30 and beyond — external recovery, or a write-off. Both are legitimate. Doing neither is not.
There is a legal ceiling on how hard you may push. The joint ACCC and ASIC Debt collection guideline: for collectors and creditors sets out that unduly frequent contact may amount to undue harassment, and gives working limits — as a guide, no more than three contact attempts a week by any one method or ten a month, with calls confined to 7.30am to 9pm on weekdays and 9am to 9pm on weekends. A documented ladder keeps you comfortably inside those bounds, which is a second reason to write it down: it is your evidence that contact was measured, not relentless.
Write-offs: the decision most operators avoid making
Arrears and bad debts are different things, and blurring them is what turns a debtor ledger into fiction. An arrear is money you expect to collect. A bad debt is money you have decided you will not.
The Australian Taxation Office is specific about the second. To claim a deduction for unrecoverable income, the amount must have previously been included in your assessable income, it must be genuinely unrecoverable, and — the condition operators miss — the decision to write it off must be made and recorded in writing before the end of the income year in which you claim it. Leaving the call until the accountant asks in October means the deduction is gone for the year just finished. Fold the review into your end-of-year sequence alongside everything else in our end of financial year checklist. (If you account on a cash basis there is nothing to write off, because the income was never brought to account.)
Provision monthly and the ledger stays truthful. Carry every uncollectable balance at face value and your receivables line — and the operating cash flow that sits under it, discussed in how to read childcare centre financial statements — quietly overstates the business to the one person who most needs an accurate picture of it.
ChildcareLink Insight: Gap-fee debt is the smaller of a centre’s two receivable pools — the subsidy side is a receivable that reconciles, not lost income. But it is the pool where money actually disappears, and it is the pool a buyer’s accountant tests line by line. |
What a collection system will not fix
Three things, and each of them is a different problem wearing the same symptom.
A fee level the catchment cannot carry. If a meaningful share of your families are structurally unable to meet the gap, that is a pricing and positioning question, not a collections one — and under the current fee-growth environment it deserves its own analysis.
An occupancy problem. Falling utilisation shows up in the debtor line late and indirectly. Chasing arrears harder will not fill rooms; lifting occupancy is separate work.
A family in genuine hardship. Some families cannot pay this month for reasons that have nothing to do with your administration. The system’s job here is to surface it in week one rather than week six, so a proper arrangement — or a properly documented decision — can be made while the amount is still small.
It is worth being precise about what this buys you, because we have argued elsewhere that systems affect the multiple rather than the earnings and that occupancy, lease and cost structure set the earnings. Collection administration is the unusual exception. It reaches the cash line as well as the multiple, because the money it recovers was already earned and billed — it simply never arrived.
Your debtor ledger is a management report
Read the aged listing fortnightly, with one person accountable for each balance on it. Not to be tougher on families, but because ageing is a leading indicator: our own due-diligence work shows a lengthening tail often precedes quiet disenrolment, which means the ledger tells you something about occupancy months before the enrolment count does. That review belongs in the same monthly rhythm as the rest of your reporting pack.
The sale consequence follows from the operating one. A vendor with a short, clean ledger can disclose it and move on; a vendor with a long tail is disclosing a problem, and a disclosed problem gets negotiated — which is where the warranties in a sale contract start being drafted around your administration. None of that is a reason to run a collections process. It is simply what happens to the ledger you have been keeping all along, once someone else starts reading it.
Want a straight read on how your centre’s numbers look to a buyer? ChildcareLink advises operators across Australia on getting the operating fundamentals right well before a sale — start with our guides to operating costs and selling a childcare centre, or get in touch for a confidential conversation.
Sources
- Department of Education (Australian Government) — Collecting gap fees; Taking all reasonable steps to collect gap fees (Family Assistance Law), 2026
- Department of Education (Australian Government) — Changes to gap fee payments from July 2023; Electronic payment of gap fee — service and individual exception applications, 2026
- Australian Taxation Office — Deductions for unrecoverable income (bad debts), 2026
- ACCC and ASIC — Debt collection guideline: for collectors and creditors (RG 96)
- ChildcareLink transaction and advisory experience — escalation-ladder sequencing and pre-sale ledger observations
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. ChildcareLink recommends seeking independent professional advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making any business or investment decisions.


